As the CORD fraternity is eagerly waiting for the return of their principal former prime minister Raila Odinga Mutahi ngunyi had this to say concerning CORD's scheduled rally that is set to call for impeachment of president Uhuru Kenyatta''Cord has no agenda and could not in any way be able to oust out Uhuru Kenyatta''

LARRY MADOWO WITH KTN NEWS ANCHOR EDITH KIMANI HAVING A GOOD TIME

''BABA'' while you were away the following happened: 1) Over 100 people die from consuming killer brews 2) Embu Governor Wambora was impeached twice, reinstated by court 3 times 3) Kidero is removed by the Court of Appeal and reinstated by the Supreme Court 4) Prof Paul Chepkwony is impeached and ..... 5) NYS Director Kiplimo Rugut was fired and replaced by Nelson Githinji 6) County Commissioners were given new powers by Uhuru and now officially the Provincial Administration is back. We are back to KANU days. 7) Britain issued travel advisory to its citizens. Uhuru govt crying foul. But they don't care that security is at an all time bad. 8) The US issues travel advisory to its citizens. Tourism is in doldrums 9) Chinese Premier Li Keqiang was in Kenya. He went to KWS and scared Elephants and Rhinos. 10) Uhuru Kenyatta decided that Anglo Leasing was no longer " a scheme to fleece public money" and ordered for the payment of Anglo Leasing debts. 11) There were two blasts at Gikomba Market. 10 people died and over 70 got seriously injured.

Attorney General Githu Muigai addressing media representatives at his office in Nairobi on May 19, 2014. He was responding to Government Anglo Leasing payout outcry. President Uhuru Kenyatta has ordered Treasury to pay Anglo Leasing firms Sh1.4 Billion.

The same individuals were involved in the creation of two Anglo Leasing type contracts for which Kenya controversially paid Sh1.4 billion on Thursday, sparking protests from opposition politicians and the Law Society of Kenya. According to documents provided by Attorney-General Githu Muigai on Monday, both First Mercantile Securities Corporation and Spacenet Inc were linked to Kenyan businessman Anura Perera. These are the two companies that President Uhuru Kenyatta directed National Treasury Cabinet Secretary Henry Rotich to pay Sh1.4 billion. According to Prof Muigai, the money was a penalty for incomplete payments for the two contracts that Kenya signed with First Mercantile Securities and Universal Satspace in 2002. “The man in front of you today is a mortician,” Prof Muigai told a Press conference in his office in Nairobi. “The patient died on the operating table. If you think the patient should have lived, ask the surgeons.” He presented a statement dated May 14, 2014, signed by Solicitor General Njee Muturi and addressed to the Senate committee on Finance, Commerce and the Budget in which Mr Muturi linked Mr Perera to the two companies. On First Mercantile, Mr Muturi said Mr Perera had confirmed that he had formed the company on December 11, 2000 and that he had been a director until 2005 together with his wife Ghazala Perera and Chritos Koumbis, his financial adviser. On Spacenet Inc, he said the firm’s registered office is in McLean, Virginia and is a subsidiary of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd whose registered office is in Israel. “By a contract dated September 1, 2002, Spacenet Inc transferred its rights and obligations... to a sister company, Gilat Satellite Networks (Holland) BV, which is also a subsidiary of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd (Israel)”. The Israeli subsidiary was contracted by the Postal Corporation of Kenya to supply communication equipment for the parastatal. It then subcontracted the work to Gilat Alldean International, which later became Alldean Satellite Networks Ltd (Kenya), a company said to belong to Mr Perera (see separate story). Companies have owners “There has been an allegation that these companies are faceless. On the contrary, the companies have owners and the records as we have here are completely up to date,” Prof Muigai told reporters on Monday. Prof Muigai has come under increasing pressure to resign from the Law Society of Kenya and from politicians allied to the opposition Coalition for Reform and Democracy (Cord) who at the weekend called for his ouster. LSK, on the other hand, has threatened to strike the AG off its roll of senior counsel. On Monday, it petitioned Parliament to begin a process of removing Prof Muigai from office (see story on Page 5). It also wrote to the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) requesting for an investigation into a possible crime of “conspiracy to defraud public finances through procurement of an irregular judgment”. Later in the evening, it emerged that the association had asked the Law Society of England to investigate whether the Anglo Leasing ruling against Kenya in a London court was a conspiracy involving the British judge who handled the case. In his defence, Prof Muigai said he should not be blamed for the scandal which led Kenya to pay the Sh1.4 billion to the two companies. Never prosecuted “The people who signed the contract have never been prosecuted,” he said. “How then were we to prove corruption? We know the people who signed it!” He also denied allegations that government lawyers had deliberately mishandled the cases involving the two companies, leading Kenya to lose them in the London and Geneva courts. “Any allegation that these cases were being mishandled for an ulterior motive...nothing could be further from the truth. Nothing could be more libelous of my officer, of my office and of myself,” he said. “This unwarranted attacking in the media, in public meetings and at funerals to my office, my officers and myself have been injurious. The treatment meted out to me in the last 72 hours is totally unjustified. I very much wish there was a more responsible way.” On whether the two companies actually supplied the equipment for which they were being paid, Prof Muigai had this to say: “It is not for the Attorney General’s office to say what has been supplied or not. But Ministry of Communications officials and their consultants (PwC) have consistently admitted that the broadband was supplied.”

Kenya times daily .Top kenyan blogger cum social media activist CABU GAH became a victim of the illicit brew scourge that left more than 150 people dead across the country.Breaking the news concerning the unfortunate death of his brother GEORGE on his social media page Cabu Gah had this to tell his followers..Cabu Gah's late brother

My elder Brother,George Gachie is NO MORE. He has joined the rest of the over 100 Kenyans who have succumbed to the toxic aftermath of the notorious illicit brew. He fell in love with the bottle years ago...And the love grew...and the love has outgrown him. Born to East Africa's Number One Drinking Nation,Kenya,George was firmly a part of the statistics. After the horrid news of the horrors of the brew started spreading on Monday evening,I got concerned. And on Tuesday Morning, I woke up early to text my siblings. I texted them via WhatsApp,telling them I had tried calling George but his phone was off...I told them to make efforts to check whether George was safe...My siblings told me they couldn't reach George either...or any of his accomplices. Perturbed, I called up Mum. Mum told Me she hadn't heard a thing. I let it slide. And at 1.36 pm same day,A former High School friend called. He was my classmate at Kamiu Secondary and also my best friend. His name is Martin. Or Marto. Marto said,"Maze Unajua niaje?" He asked in a cold,sulken voice. I knew things were bad. I asked,"Ni nini..??" He said,"Mbuyu ameishia..." I screamed,"Uwongo!!!" He said,"Yeah,ameishia leo asubui..." And for a minute,or two,I was speechless. I just stood there,transfixed, phone in hand,tight-lipped and totally unable to react. After a moment,he told me,"Na bro yako umeskia??" I asked,"Nini???" He said,"Ako hosi ...amelala hosi pia..." Again I screamed,"Uwongo!!" I hollered to the phone...and bellowed in utter despair. Crushed beyond comprehension, I sighed hard and said,"Sawa Marto.. sawa ..." Immediately, I called Up Mum. "Mum,nimeskia George ako hosi..." Hesitantly, Mum said,"Nimeambiwa. Hata naenda huko saa hii..." And Mum went. He met George at Embu General Hospital... And when she arrived,it was a sea of humanity...Hundreds of worried families were littered across the hallways,women were weeping and sulking at the waiting bays, the wards were full..Doctors were scampering around... huffing and puffing... And in the wards ,it was a SCENE FROM HELL. Mama squeezed herself in....full of panic and trepidation. The halls were full of people...Crowds of crying women,crowds of screaming souls...Dying people...it was a horror scene. Mama was led to my brother's bed. And he lay there...breathing heavy and holding on to the hands of his girlfriend. Mama broke down. And hugged my brother. Mama asked Brother,"George,Unaniona??" George sat up in pain...holding on to his stomach and stretching his frail hand..."Eeeh nakuona Mum" George said. "Nimevaa aje? Nguo Yangu ni ya color gani??" Mum,asked. "Red...Red na Black..." George answered. "Kwa hivo unaona??" Mum asked. "Eeee naona Mum..lakini kidogo..." He laboriously answered. Mum gave him fruits,lucozade and a hug. And sat on his bed. People kept filling into the ward...Others kept losing lives and others kept screaming, trying to hold on to their lives...it was chaotic and unbearable. My Brother's girlfriend was still there,drunk too...holding on to George and screaming at him,"Georgie amka! Amka Georgie! Unaniona??? Unaniona Georgie???" At 5.30 pm,George asked Mum,"Ni saa ngapi Mum?" Mum told him,"Ni 5.30 ..." "Ati 5.30???" George asked,shocked and sitting up on his bed. " Eeeh ni 5.30. kwanini??" Mum asked. George didn't answer. George started crying. And at that point,Mum knew that George had gone blind. "Unaona huyu daktari??" Mum asked. "Mgani??" George asked,moving his head. " Huyu..." Mum said pointing. "Mgani??" George asked again. And at that point, Mum cried. And hugged her son hard. George was OFFICIALLY BLIND. Mum stayed at the Hospital till 8.30pm Tuesday night. And left George at the hands of a nurse and his equally drunk Girl. And following Morning, Wednesday Morning,Mum got up to rush to the hospital. With porridge, fruits and a bowl of chicken soup. But on arrival to the hospital,George was NOT on his bed. Instead,it was HIS GIRLFRIEND on the Bed. George had been moved. Not to another bed,But to a colder place. George had been moved to the MORTUARY. George was GONE. I am in Embu right now. And EMBU IS IN DEEP,DEEP MOURNING. And People,You think its ONLY 50 People who have died in Embu?? You're being lied to. Embu ALONE has lost over 100 people...take my word... People are collapsing in homes...by the roadside... in the middle of conversations... its A PURE APOCALYPTIC scene. My little village alone lost 3 people. Funeral meetings are allover my village. From our home to the next home to the next home. People DONT even know which HOME to visit. Mr. Mututho,instead of wasting resources arresting RICH PEOPLE driving BIG CARS past midnight, dragging them out of their cars to test their Alcohol level,and then arrest and charge them LIKE SERIAL MURDERERS or DEADLY RAPISTS,You should instead FOCUS Your immense energies in ARRESTING the REAL CRIMINALS. THE REAL CRIMINALS ARE NOT the men driving themselves HOME after a night out,its the UNSCRUPULOUS thugs selling METHANOL to low-life Kenyans across the country. Just to make a quick buck. And earn a fatter profit. THOSE ARE THE REAL CRIMINALS. ARREST THOSE!!! Until YOUR OWN BLOOD RELATIVE dies of a National Disaster, that's WHEN YOU FEEL the PAIN. And please Chang'aa DOESNT KILL. It has been brewed, sold and consumed since INDEPENDENCE. POISON KILLS. So,let's stop sugarcoating things; TRUTH IS; Over 200 KENYANS HAVE BEEN POISONED. In broad daylight. I don't WHO did it. Or how. But this is more than just illicit brew,this is a HORRIBLE case of National Poisoning.... From Kiambu to Machakos to Murang'a to Embu to Kitui. This NATION SERIOUSLY NEEDS A SPIRITUAL INTERVENTION.

Top kenyan political analyst Mutahi Ngunyi had this to say on the much hyped anglo leasing debt..Anglo leasing story does not add up.Uhuru stealing ksh1.4b?.If it is an international obligation he should pay and then ask CORD to sit on a pin

Top kenyan socialite Vanessa Chettle was caught on camera doing this to her blood sister in a club...is it as a result of intoxication.After a close probe Vanessa claimed that she was not making out with her sister they were just ''sharing'' shisha smoke...do you believe in the hearsay .

Earlier today kenyans took wikipedia website under a hawk eye and were able to unearth error with a demeaning intention to the Government of Kenya by terming Internal security cabinet secretary as a mere cook.though the section of his profile carring the demeaning terms were latter pulled down Kenyans had already taken screenshots of the article ..below is the article as it was before it was pulled down ...

Devolution and Planning cabinet secretary Anne Waiguru gathered national attention when it was reported that she fired former KWS Director General Japther Rugut by sending him a message detailing to him that he was no longer the KWS director.These are claims that Anne Waiguru has strongly refuted stating that Rugut was not the only one sacked others affected were Director General and his deputy as well

Trending images size 8 on stage .whats your opinion photoshopped or real praising the almight

Director of Digital and Diaspora Dennis Itumbi has come out openly condemning CORD fraternity for questioning the president on his administration citing tribal biased appointments.This comes after Cord rally in Raila's stronghold kibera was aired live in k24tv which is owned by president Uhuru..this is what Dennis Itumbi posted on his twitter handle........President Uhuru Kenyatta's k24 airing Cord rally in kibera live.Same guy we insist is tribal

TOP 10 SINS COMMITTED ON FACEBOOK* 1. You buy some cheap underwear at a Bend-Down-Select under market & on facebook you write:"I love Gucci underwears" *God is watching you* 2. You're a married man with 2 kids & on facebook you always claim to be single *God is watching you* 3. You're 21 yrs old & you're dating 54 yrs old man, your updates say "can't wait to see my baby." Is that your baby or your daddy? *God is watching you* 4. You're are drinking ice water & you update "I'm drinking Johnny Walker on the rocks" *God is watching you* 5. You're in the house watching WWE raw but you update “watching silver bird at the cinemas” *God is watching you* 6. You sell retail biscuit airtime and chewing gums or in an MPESA SHOP & you update "had a long day in the office" *God is watching you* 7. You are waiting for a mat/taxi & u update “stuck in traffic thank God for the air conditioner in ma car" *God is watching you* 8. You are using some fake Nokia phone and you update your status "My laptop is slow" *God is watching you* 9.You are in some fake slum and you update your status "near New York" *God is watching you* 10.You are a watchman and on your status updates you claim you're KDF based in Somalia. 11.Ulikataa masomo ukiwa form 2 na profile yako umeandika "Studied MBA in KU '09" *God is watchin u* 12.Unakula ugali kavu na unaandika "At galittos;damn!i cant finish all this pizza ba maself!" *God is watching you*

Below is a post by a former kenyan presidencial hopeful kingwa kamencu voicing her opinion on sex in Africa........The presentation of sex in Africa as something only worthy of psychological and pathological study and discussion, has gone on for too long. The discourse around sex to date, has been related to FGM, rape, HIV/AIDS, child marriage, homophobia and other negative practices and attitudes. This collective negative approach is the single story African sexualities have shrouded themselves in since colonialism, and under the banner of religious conservatism, not bothered to explore, discover and share other ways of being. (And how rich and open the discussion and practices were in many communities before religious straitjacketing) The reality of the situation for we Africans in the 21st century, is that our genitals are in chains. Frantz Fanon or possibly his Pan-African predecessor W. B Du Bois would have said it well: the liberation of the genitals is the true third liberation the African continent has been waiting for.

After Mary Wambui was reinstated as the Othaya mp by the Supreme Court Kenyan judiciary has come under scrutiny over claims of double standards in implementing justice below is a post on social media that tries to unravel the mystery in th Judiciary......... By George Kegoro Last week’s Supreme Court decision to reinstate Othaya MP Mary Wambui demonstrates the uncertainties that still characterise the search for electoral justice in the country, despite the reforms that have recently been attempted to address this area. Before the passage of the 2010 Constitution, shortcomings in electoral justice revolved around delays by the courts in concluding suits challenging the outcome of elections, the expense of such suits and an increasingly technical approach by the courts in dealing with such disputes, often negating substantive justice. The constitutional reforms addressed some of these issues and, for example, established the Supreme Court as a new court with the jurisdiction to deal with disputes relating to the election of the President. Presidential petitions were previously handled by the High Court, and, while no right of appeal existed, the Court of Appeal controversially listened to an appeal from the High Court in a petition by Kenneth Matiba against Daniel Moi, after the 1992 elections, amid setbacks that Moi had suffered in the High Court. Uncertainties arose on whether the right of appeal applied only in that petition or would apply in future. It took the 1997 Inter-Party Parliamentary Group’s amendment of the constitution to create a right of appeal to the Court of Appeal to clarify the situation. In entertaining disputes other than for presidential elections, for which it has no jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has set the country in the same sphere of uncertainty as the former Court of Appeal had done. In future, people who lose appeals will be tempted to contrive a second appeal to the Supreme Court. The new Constitution addressed the problem of delays by requiring that electoral disputes be resolved within defined timelines. The Matiba vs Moi petition was decided after a 12-month delay while the Kibaki vs Moi dispute was concluded after 24 months. The constitution now requires presidential petitions to be completed within 14 days. This is the period it took the Supreme Court to give the country a decision in the Odinga vs Kenyatta petition. While 14 days is quick, it asserts massive pressure for time on the court and the parties, and some of the criticism against the Supreme Court process in the presidential petition resulted from the very short timelines required for deciding the case. Disputes arising from parliamentary and governors’ elections are handled by the High Court and a restricted right of appeal to the Court of Appeal, confined to “issues of law,” is allowed. The constitution requires the High Court to resolve electoral disputes within six months and appeals to the Court of Appeal must also be decided in six months. In the past, delays in resolving parliamentary disputes were so severe that parliamentary terms elapsed before some of the petitions were decided. It is a credit to the High Court that, in relation to petitions from the 2013 elections, the demanding timelines have been met. This is the more creditable because the High Court received far more petitions than had been filed after previous elections. Similarly, the Court of Appeal has been struggling to meet its deadlines and the outlook is that it is also doing well. As indicated, no right of appeal exists beyond the Court of Appeal in disputes from parliamentary and governors’ elections. The first batch of decisions made by the courts appeared to be guided by this view until the Court of Appeal invalidated the election of Meru governor, Peter Munya, on appeal. Other than its original jurisdiction in presidential electoral disputes, the Supreme Court is vested with a qualified appellate jurisdiction on cases from courts below it. One can appeal to the Supreme Court “as of right in any case involving the interpretation or application of this Constitution’’ and also “in any other case in which the Supreme Court, or the Court of Appeal, certifies that a matter of general public importance is involved.” It is this jurisdiction that Mr Munya invoked to obtain what was previously viewed as an unlikely foothold in the Supreme Court. This created a domino effect and several other persons, resigned to their fate after failing in the Court of Appeal, now found they could go to the Supreme Court. Having allowed Munya, it would have been difficult for the Supreme Court to shut out the others. Because this is a restricted right of appeal, all the parties that have made their way to the Supreme Court have had to make clever arguments to the effect that the decision of the Court of Appeal in their case involves the interpretation or application of the Constitution, as opposed to simple claims that they do not accept the decisions appealed against. A lingering accusation against the former Court of Appeal, the one that the Supreme Court supplanted, is that it was pre-occupied with technicalities, at the expense of substantive justice. For example, having delayed judgment in the Matiba petition, the court then dismissed the petition because Matiba, unable to write because of a disability he had suffered while under arrest, had not personally signed the court papers, as required by law. The Kibaki vs Moi petition was also dismissed on a technicality, that Kibaki had not served the petition papers personally on Moi, a requirement of the law. This particular decision was to inspire a provision of the new Constitution that the service of petitions does not have to be on the individual sued. Chief Justice Willy Mutunga, aware of the weight of history, enacted rules of procedure that de-emphasise technical compliance and promote substantive justice, which is also a requirement of the 2010 Constitution. The pressure generated by the Odinga petition was, however, sufficient to make the new court depart from the high plane of substantive justice, as the court disallowed a further affidavit filed by Odinga, ruling that to allow it would prejudice the other parties. This same approach characterised the decision of the court in the Wambui case. The original petition against Wambui was filed by reference to the Elections Act, which requires petitions to be filed within 28 days from the date the results are published in the gazette. WITHIN THE TIME The Constitution, however, provides that the 28 days start running when the results are announced by the returning officer. A mathematical computation shows that Mr Peter Gichuki King’ara, the petitioner against Wambui, filed within the time allowed by the Elections Act, but six days late if time is computed by reference to the provision in the Constitution. However, in both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, the issue of the possible late filing had not been raised, and the petition was decided on other grounds. The computation of time first became an issue when the parties reached the Supreme Court and was the last of 12 grounds on which Wambui’s appeal was based. By then the court had decided a portion of the Shahbal v Joho petition, determining that time runs as provided in the Constitution and that the Elections Act, therefore, contravenes the Constitution. In the Wambui judgment, the Supreme Court addressed only this issue, finding as it had done in the Joho case, that the relevant provision in the Elections Act contravened the Constitution and was, therefore, void. By reference to the Constitution, King’ara’s petition in the High Court was filed late and was therefore incompetent. It is on this ground, and this ground only, that the court allowed Wambui back into the legislature. Having made a decision based on this technicality, the court found it superfluous to determine the other issues that had been raised in the petition. A reading of the judgment reveals little distinction between the approach by the Supreme Court and the former Court of Appeal. Both are courts of technicalities, and surprises. The judgment makes clear that the exclusion of the Odinga affidavit by the court, which has since been criticised, was not an aberration but part of the court’s doctrine to promote “predictability, certainty, uniformity and stability’. While King’ara demonstrated that he had a reasonable basis on which he computed time, by reliance on an Act of Parliament, this was not enough to save him. A troubling issue regarding this judgment is how the court handled King’ara’s own complaints regarding the computation of time in Wambui’s appeal. When the Court of Appeal decided against her, Wambui filed a notice of appeal in the Supreme Court, well within the 14 days allowed by the rules of the court. Thereafter, her legal team pursued an application in the Court of Appeal for leave to go to the Supreme Court, in the middle of which Munya’s appeal to the Supreme Court was admitted. Realizing that they could also have filed in the Supreme Court directly, rather than with the leave of the Court of Appeal, the Wambui team then filed the petition but by then the 30 days allowed for filing had elapsed and had been exceeded by 33 days. This issue was specifically raised during a preliminary hearing before Justices Kalpana Rawal and Mohammed Ibrahim, as King’ara had applied for the dismissal of the Wambui petition for late filing. The two judges dismissed the preliminary objection, holding that in the public interest, they had the discretion to allow Wambui to file late. However, King’ara himself found no such luck when Wambui raised the issue of time in relation to his filing at the High Court. King’ara’s legal team claims that they also raised the same issues of the late filing to counter her similar claims, when the main petition was heard. However, these are not reflected in the judgment of the court. It is difficult to understand how, towards one party, the court showed so much leniency when interpreting time, but was so strict to another party in the same proceedings. The uniformity that the court said it was promoting is not borne out by the differing treatment of Wambui and King’ara by the court, and leads to the conclusion that, in the Supreme Court, what is good for the goose is not necessarily good for the gander. While the Supreme Court was created as a stabilising factor for the country’s legal system, it is difficult to argue that it is having this effect so far. Like in the presidential petition where the court’s decision left many unanswered questions, it has done so in the Wambui petition as well.